過去ログ

                                Page  780438
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
   通常モードに戻る  ┃  INDEX  ┃  ≪前へ  │  次へ≫   
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
 ▼killed.For apprehen  advessphype 13/8/19(月) 9:58

 ───────────────────────────────────────
 ■題名 : killed.For apprehen
 ■名前 : advessphype <Snolobiabyr@airjordanoutlethomes.us>
 ■日付 : 13/8/19(月) 9:58
 ■Web : http://monster465.client.jp/
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Today??s proposed ruling is a tremendous &#12514;&#12531;&#12473;&#12479;&#12540; &#12504;&#12483;&#12489;&#12507;&#12531; &#12491;&#12475;&#12514;&#12494; win for HP and its customers. The Superior Court from the State of California, Santa Clara County, has confirmed the &#12514;&#12531;&#12473;&#12479;&#12540; &#12504;&#12483;&#12489;&#12507;&#12531; &#20385;&#26684; existence of a contract between HP and Oracle that demands Oracle to port its software program products to HP??s Itanium-based servers. We anticipate Oracle &#12514;&#12531;&#12473;&#12479;&#12540; &#12504;&#12483;&#12489;&#12507;&#12531; &#12467;&#12540;&#12489; to comply with its contractual obligation as ordered by the Court.

In its personal statement from http://monster845.genin.jp/ spokeswoman Deborah Hellinger, Oracle stated it plans to appeal and plans to pursue related counter-claims it has brought in the suit.

Final March, Oracle made an &#12514;&#12531;&#12473;&#12479;&#12540; &#12504;&#12483;&#12489;&#12507;&#12531; &#20385;&#26684; engineering choice to stop future software program improvement on the Itanium &#12514;&#12531;&#12473;&#12479;&#12540; &#12504;&#12483;&#12489;&#12507;&#12531; &#12467;&#12540;&#12489; chip. We produced the decision as we became convinced that http://monster5451.biroudo.jp/ Itanium was approaching its end of life and we explained our rationale to clients here: . Absolutely nothing within the Court??s preliminary &#12514;&#12531;&#12473;&#12479;&#12540; &#12504;&#12483;&#12489;&#12507;&#12531; &#24215;&#33303; opinion modifications that reality. We know that Oracle did not quit its fundamental right to make platform engineering choices within the 27 words HP cites in the settlement of an unrelated employment agreement. HP??s argument turns the idea of Silicon Valley ??partnerships?? upside down. We plan to appeal the Court??s ruling whilst fully litigating our cross claims that HP misled both its partners and clients.

In his opinion, Judge James Kleinberg http://monster465.client.jp/ wrote that Oracle??s has an obligation to continue to provide its goods on HP??s Itanium-based servers until HP &#12514;&#12531;&#12473;&#12479;&#12540; &#12504;&#12483;&#12489;&#12507;&#12531; &#12491;&#12475;&#12514;&#12494; stops promoting them.

It all began up in &#12514;&#12531;&#12473;&#12479;&#12540; &#12504;&#12483;&#12489;&#12507;&#12531; &#38899;&#36074; late 2010, when they settled a lawsuit stemming from &#12514;&#12531;&#12473;&#12479;&#12540; &#12504;&#12483;&#12489;&#12507;&#12531; &#27491;&#35215; Mark Hurd??s following his resignation as the CEO of HP.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━    通常モードに戻る  ┃  INDEX  ┃  ≪前へ  │  次へ≫    ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━                                 Page 780438