Ｐａｇｅ 778828 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 通常モードに戻る ┃ ＩＮＤＥＸ ┃ ≪前へ │ 次へ≫ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ▼non-native humongou gresiasmics 13/8/17(土) 17:43 ─────────────────────────────────────── ■題名 ： non-native humongou ■名前 ： gresiasmics <MoonnobeHenwq@placebod.com> ■日付 ： 13/8/17(土) 17:43 ■Ｗｅｂ ： http://gucci00010.kanpaku.jp/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Google is offering publishers a new tool that lets them force users http://gucci0007.shin-gen.jp/ to ??share?? a story prior to they study it themselves. That can??t be right, can it? Not precisely. That situation is what encountered when he study a story on site today, グッチバッグ 激安 but that??s not what??s supposed to occur. Rather, Kidder should have had a choice of filling out a one- or two-question survey or sharing the story on Twitter, グッチ Facebook or Google+. Bug, not a function, says a Google spokesrep, by way of e-mail: Usually, Google Consumer Surveys are designed to show a marketplace research query along with an alternate, publisher defined action, like signing in or sharing a piece of content material. グッチ Together with the surveys, we also offer a number of controls to prevent abuse from the method. Unfortunately, http://gucci0008.biroudo.jp/ in rare cases, because of these controls, a prompt runs without a survey query integrated. This is not the intended behavior and we are presently operating on a fix. <UPDATE> This really is now fixed, a Google rep says.] Okay, fair enough. As far because the survey that AdWeek customers are supposed to see, グッチ which acts as an ersatz spend wall by generating a little charge for AdWeek and Google each time someone fills it out: Annoying along with a small clumsy, but not terrible. I??ve , and I??ve utilized it several occasions, グッチ 長財布 but each time I encounter it I think something??s broken on the site. Then I keep in mind what??s happening, make a couple of clicks with out providing it a lick of thought ?? today??s survey was about professional medical supplies, I think, but I truly have no idea ?? and move on. Difficult to see how this really is useful for the survey sponsor, グッチ but I??ve usually discovered on-line sponsor polls to become baffling. So perhaps it??s a less-bad choice. In any case, it??s a few clicks, so I??d favor that to having Adweek crap up their site with slideshows, http://gucci00010.kanpaku.jp/ or forcing me to make lots of clicks to study a one-page story, which happens all over the Internet nowadays. グッチバッグ I also prefer it to Facebook??s ??frictionless sharing?? by way of ??social readers,?? which finish up automatically belching up my friends?? reading habits into my feed, whether or not or not either of us wanted that to happen. And within the big image, グッチバッグ unless the website you like is utilizing the ??borrow money from investors, pay back by ?? strategy, you??re always going to end up paying some thing to make use of it. Either you pull out your bank card, グッチ財布 or you lend them your eyeballs so they are able to rent them out to advertisers. And in the event you don??t like these choices, you??re going to finish up with a a lot emptier Web. |