過去ログ

                                Page  772604
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
   通常モードに戻る  ┃  INDEX  ┃  ≪前へ  │  次へ≫   
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
 ▼her two prime, or p  Immuthdut 13/8/10(土) 14:34

 ───────────────────────────────────────
 ■題名 : her two prime, or p
 ■名前 : Immuthdut <Acertullyweerwe@placebod.com>
 ■日付 : 13/8/10(土) 14:34
 ■Web : http://conda00012.ashigaru.jp/
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Google is offering publishers a new tool that lets them force users http://gucci0007.shin-gen.jp/ to ??share?? a story before they study it themselves.

That can??t be right, can it?

Not exactly. That situation is what encountered when he read a story on site today, &#12464;&#12483;&#12481;&#12496;&#12483;&#12464; but that??s not what??s supposed to occur.

Instead, Kidder should have had a option of filling out a one- or two-question survey or sharing the story on Twitter, &#12464;&#12483;&#12481; &#24215;&#33303; Facebook or Google+.

Bug, not a feature, says a Google spokesrep, via email:

Generally, Google Consumer Surveys are designed to show a market study query along with an alternate, publisher defined action, such as signing in or sharing a piece of content material. &#12464;&#12483;&#12481;&#12496;&#12483;&#12464; Together with the surveys, we also offer a number of controls to stop abuse of the system. Unfortunately, http://gucci0008.biroudo.jp/ in uncommon instances, as a result of these controls, a prompt runs with out a survey query included. This is not the intended behavior and we are currently operating on a repair.

<UPDATE> This is now fixed, a Google rep says.]

Okay, fair sufficient. As far as the survey that AdWeek users are supposed to see, &#12464;&#12483;&#12481;&#12496;&#12483;&#12464; which acts as an ersatz pay wall by generating a little fee for AdWeek and Google each time someone fills it out: Annoying and a small clumsy, but not terrible.

I??ve , and I??ve utilized it a number of times, &#36001;&#24067;&#12464;&#12483;&#12481; but each time I encounter it I believe something??s broken on the site. Then I keep in mind what??s taking place, make a couple of clicks without giving it a lick of believed ?? today??s survey was about professional healthcare supplies, I believe, but I really have no concept ?? and move on.

Hard to see how this really is useful for the survey sponsor, &#12464;&#12483;&#12481; &#38263;&#36001;&#24067; but I??ve usually discovered on-line sponsor polls to be baffling. So maybe it??s a less-bad option.

In any case, it??s a couple of clicks, so I??d prefer that to getting Adweek crap up their site with slideshows, http://gucci00010.kanpaku.jp/ or forcing me to make lots of clicks to read a one-page story, which occurs all more than the Web nowadays. &#12464;&#12483;&#12481; I also prefer it to Facebook??s ??frictionless sharing?? by way of ??social readers,?? which end up automatically belching up my friends?? reading habits into my feed, whether or not either of us wanted that to occur.

And in the large image, &#12464;&#12483;&#12481; unless the site you like is using the ??borrow cash from investors, spend back by ?? strategy, you??re usually going to finish up paying some thing to use it.

Either you pull out your bank card, &#12464;&#12483;&#12481; or you lend them your eyeballs so they are able to rent them out to advertisers. And if you don??t like those choices, you??re going to finish up with a much emptier Web.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━    通常モードに戻る  ┃  INDEX  ┃  ≪前へ  │  次へ≫    ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━                                 Page 772604