Ｐａｇｅ 771767 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 通常モードに戻る ┃ ＩＮＤＥＸ ┃ ≪前へ │ 次へ≫ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ▼Sector Court to the Woursorma 13/8/9(金) 13:06 ─────────────────────────────────────── ■題名 ： Sector Court to the ■名前 ： Woursorma <FomamsPoomadyin@zoroasterplace.com> ■日付 ： 13/8/9(金) 13:06 ■Ｗｅｂ ： http://ferragamo0001.amigasa.jp/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Keep in mind how last week the judge in the all-but-concluded case of Oracle vs. http://vivienne10.ashigaru.jp/ Google ordered the two companies to disclose whom, if anybody, they might have been ? Yeah, that. So anyway, these days was the deadline for the companies to drop their filings, and, well, here they are. Brief answer: Oracle reiterated what it stated before, that it had retained the patent law blogger , ヴィヴィアンバッグ he of , as a paid consultant in the case, although this wasn??t exactly news since Mueller and Oracle had each already . Additionally, it talked about an Oracle corporate blogger who wrote concerning the case while it was going on. Google for its component appears to have shrugged. ??Neither Google nor its counsel has paid an author, ヴィヴィアンバッグ journalist, commentator or blogger to report or comment on any problems within this case. And neither Google nor its counsel has been involved in any quid pro quo in exchange for coverage of or articles concerning the problems in this case.?? That statement much more or less sums up Google??s position, vivienne westwood 新作 though it goes on to say that it doesn??t fairly comprehend what the judge is asking for. The end of Oracle??s filing provides a clue. It names , president and CEO of the Computer http://ferragamo0001.amigasa.jp/ and Communications Business Association, of which Google has , and , author of the book ??,?? which Google referenced in a few of its presentations in court. Says Oracle: ??Google maintains a network of direct and indirect ??influencers?? to advance Google??s intellectual property agenda. フェラガモ 時計 This network is extensive, such as attorneys, lobbyists, trade associations, academics, and bloggers, and its concentrate extends beyond pure intellectual property issues to competition/antitrust issues. ?? Oracle believes that Google brought this extensive network of influencers to assist shape public perceptions regarding the positions it was advocating all through this trial.?? Update: I??ve just heard from Daniel O??Connor, the Senior Director of Public Policy & Government Affairs in the CCIA, サルバトーレフェラガモ and he reminds me that the organization has long had a staked-out position on the copyrightability of APIs ?? which was a key issue in the trial ?? because the days when Oracle and Sun Microsystems were members of the organization and Google was not. Another update: And now I??ve received a statement from Band: I am a registered lobbyist for NetCoalition and also the Pc & Communications Business Association, フェラガモ カチューシャ trade associations whose members include Google. Oracle until recently also was a member of CCIA. I do not represent Google. The book cited in Google??s brief, Interfaces on Trial two.0, was accepted for publication by MIT Press in the fall of 2009, http://ferragamo0002.at-ninja.jp/ prior to Oracle completed its purchase of Sun Microsystems, and approximately a year before Oracle sued Google. As the book clearly indicates, a lot of it is based on articles I authored or co-authored prior to 2005, フェラガモ アウトレット while I was a partner at Morrison & Foerster, the firm that now represents Oracle in this litigation. Several of my co-authors were also Morrison & Foerster lawyers. The book advances exactly the same policy perspective as the first volume, Interfaces on Trial, which was published in 1995, when I was a partner at Morrison & Foerster. Within the Acknowledgements section of that volume, フェラガモ 靴 メンズ we thank Michael Jacobs (the Morrison & Foerster partner who signed the Oracle filing) and several other then-Morrison & Foerster partners for their contribution to our understanding of copyright law. Both books are available for free download at . It should be noted that the policy perspective we articulated in each books was shared by Sun Microsystems, and, at that time, by Oracle. Sun and Oracle not only were members from the CCIA, フェラガモ 店舗 but were also members from the American Committee for Interoperable Systems and the European Committee for Interoperable Systems, groups that advocated positions consistent with those taken by Google within this case. There you've it. We??ll see what presiding Judge William Alsup says about this within the coming days. I??ve embedded the two filings below. First, Google??s filing. And now Oracle??s. |