Ｐａｇｅ 769963 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 通常モードに戻る ┃ ＩＮＤＥＸ ┃ ≪前へ │ 次へ≫ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ▼the tempest mechani PaypeBessTest 13/8/5(月) 17:46 ─────────────────────────────────────── ■題名 ： the tempest mechani ■名前 ： PaypeBessTest <Booneewoopyan@zoroasterplace.com> ■日付 ： 13/8/5(月) 17:46 ■Ｗｅｂ ： http://ferragamo0005.aikotoba.jp/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Remember how last week the judge in the all-but-concluded case of Oracle vs. http://vivienne10.ashigaru.jp/ Google ordered the two businesses to disclose whom, if anyone, they may have been ? Yeah, that. So anyway, these days was the deadline for the companies to drop their filings, and, well, right here they are. Short answer: Oracle reiterated what it said before, that it had retained the patent law blogger , vivienne westwood 新作 he of , as a paid consultant in the case, although this wasn??t exactly news since Mueller and Oracle had each currently . It also mentioned an Oracle corporate blogger who wrote about the case whilst it was going on. Google for its part seems to possess shrugged. ??Neither Google nor its counsel has paid an author, ヴィヴィアン 正規品 journalist, commentator or blogger to report or comment on any problems in this case. And neither Google nor its counsel has been involved in any quid pro quo in exchange for coverage of or articles concerning the problems in this case.?? That statement much more or less sums up Google??s position, ヴィヴィアン 正規品 although it goes on to say that it doesn??t fairly understand what the judge is asking for. The finish of Oracle??s filing provides a clue. It names , president and CEO from the Computer http://ferragamo0001.amigasa.jp/ and Communications Business Association, of which Google has , and , author from the book ??,?? which Google referenced in some of its presentations in court. Says Oracle: ??Google maintains a network of direct and indirect ??influencers?? to advance Google??s intellectual property agenda. フェラガモ カチューシャ This network is extensive, such as attorneys, lobbyists, trade associations, academics, and bloggers, and its concentrate extends beyond pure intellectual property issues to competition/antitrust issues. ?? Oracle believes that Google brought this in depth network of influencers to assist shape public perceptions regarding the positions it was advocating throughout this trial.?? Update: I??ve just heard from Daniel O??Connor, the Senior Director of Public Policy & Government Affairs in the CCIA, フェラガモ 靴 and he reminds me that the organization has long had a staked-out position on the copyrightability of APIs ?? which was a key issue in the trial ?? because the days when Oracle and Sun Microsystems were members of the organization and Google was not. Another update: And now I??ve received a statement from Band: I am a registered lobbyist for NetCoalition and also the Computer & Communications Business Association, メンズ フェラガモ trade associations whose members include Google. Oracle until recently also was a member of CCIA. I do not represent Google. The book cited in Google??s brief, Interfaces on Trial 2.0, was accepted for publication by MIT Press within the fall of 2009, http://ferragamo0002.at-ninja.jp/ prior to Oracle completed its purchase of Sun Microsystems, and approximately a year before Oracle sued Google. As the book clearly indicates, much of it is based on articles I authored or co-authored prior to 2005, フェラガモ アウトレット whilst I was a partner at Morrison & Foerster, the firm that now represents Oracle in this litigation. Several of my co-authors were also Morrison & Foerster lawyers. The book advances exactly the same policy perspective as the first volume, Interfaces on Trial, which was published in 1995, when I was a partner at Morrison & Foerster. Within the Acknowledgements section of that volume, フェラガモ 店舗 we thank Michael Jacobs (the Morrison & Foerster partner who signed the Oracle filing) and a number of other then-Morrison & Foerster partners for their contribution to our understanding of copyright law. Both books are available for totally free download at . It should be noted that the policy perspective we articulated in each books was shared by Sun Microsystems, and, at that time, by Oracle. Sun and Oracle not only were members of the CCIA, フェラガモ 財布 but were also members from the American Committee for Interoperable Systems and the European Committee for Interoperable Systems, groups that advocated positions consistent with these taken by Google within this case. There you have it. We??ll see what presiding Judge William Alsup says about this in the coming days. I??ve embedded the two filings below. First, Google??s filing. And now Oracle??s. |