Ｐａｇｅ 769246 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 通常モードに戻る ┃ ＩＮＤＥＸ ┃ ≪前へ │ 次へ≫ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ▼unhesitatingly over Papsmangina 13/8/3(土) 10:08 ─────────────────────────────────────── ■題名 ： unhesitatingly over ■名前 ： Papsmangina <excactelsjj@zoroasterplace.com> ■日付 ： 13/8/3(土) 10:08 ■Ｗｅｂ ： http://vivienne0007.masa-mune.jp/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Remember how final week the judge in the all-but-concluded case of Oracle vs. http://vivienne10.ashigaru.jp/ Google ordered the two businesses to disclose whom, if anybody, they might happen to be ? Yeah, that. So anyway, today was the deadline for the businesses to drop their filings, and, well, here they are. Short answer: Oracle reiterated what it stated prior to, that it had retained the patent law blogger , vivienne westwood メンズ 財布 he of , as a paid consultant in the case, although this wasn??t precisely news since Mueller and Oracle had both currently . Additionally, it mentioned an Oracle corporate blogger who wrote concerning the case whilst it was going on. Google for its part seems to have shrugged. ??Neither Google nor its counsel has paid an author, ヴィヴィアン 長財布 新作 journalist, commentator or blogger to report or comment on any problems in this case. And neither Google nor its counsel has been involved in any quid pro quo in exchange for coverage of or articles concerning the problems within this case.?? That statement more or much less sums up Google??s position, vivienne westwood メンズ 財布 although it goes on to say that it doesn??t fairly understand what the judge is asking for. The finish of Oracle??s filing offers a clue. It names , president and CEO of the Pc http://ferragamo0001.amigasa.jp/ and Communications Industry Association, of which Google has , and , author of the book ??,?? which Google referenced in some of its presentations in court. Says Oracle: ??Google maintains a network of direct and indirect ??influencers?? to advance Google??s intellectual home agenda. フェラガモ 時計 This network is extensive, including attorneys, lobbyists, trade associations, academics, and bloggers, and its concentrate extends beyond pure intellectual home problems to competition/antitrust issues. ?? Oracle believes that Google brought this extensive network of influencers to assist shape public perceptions concerning the positions it was advocating all through this trial.?? Update: I??ve just heard from Daniel O??Connor, the Senior Director of Public Policy & Government Affairs in the CCIA, サルバトーレフェラガモ and he reminds me that the organization has long had a staked-out position on the copyrightability of APIs ?? which was a key issue in the trial ?? since the days when Oracle and Sun Microsystems were members of the organization and Google was not. Another update: And now I??ve received a statement from Band: I am a registered lobbyist for NetCoalition and also the Computer & Communications Industry Association, サルバトーレフェラガモ trade associations whose members include Google. Oracle until recently also was a member of CCIA. I do not represent Google. The book cited in Google??s brief, Interfaces on Trial 2.0, was accepted for publication by MIT Press within the fall of 2009, http://ferragamo0002.at-ninja.jp/ prior to Oracle completed its purchase of Sun Microsystems, and approximately a year before Oracle sued Google. As the book clearly indicates, a lot of it is based on articles I authored or co-authored prior to 2005, 靴 フェラガモ while I was a partner at Morrison & Foerster, the firm that now represents Oracle in this litigation. A number of of my co-authors were also Morrison & Foerster lawyers. The book advances the same policy perspective as the first volume, Interfaces on Trial, which was published in 1995, when I was a partner at Morrison & Foerster. Within the Acknowledgements section of that volume, フェラガモ 店舗 we thank Michael Jacobs (the Morrison & Foerster partner who signed the Oracle filing) and a number of other then-Morrison & Foerster partners for their contribution to our understanding of copyright law. Both books are available for free download at . It should be noted that the policy perspective we articulated in both books was shared by Sun Microsystems, and, at that time, by Oracle. Sun and Oracle not only were members from the CCIA, フェラガモ 靴 メンズ but were also members from the American Committee for Interoperable Systems and the European Committee for Interoperable Systems, groups that advocated positions consistent with those taken by Google in this case. There you have it. We??ll see what presiding Judge William Alsup says about this within the coming days. I??ve embedded the two filings below. First, Google??s filing. And now Oracle??s. |