| | Most gun owners would absolutely agree that a backgorund check should be p louis vuitton borse art of any gun sale. The problem is found right in your last sentence:"That's not to suggest that limiting access to certain types of weapons and high-capacity magazines isn't important, too"Even right after you admitted that so- borse louis vuitton called "assault weapons" are rarely used to commit murder (less than 1% of murders, according to the FBI), you put banning the Louis Vuitton Borse m, along with magazine restrictions, right in there still as "important". How can something that even statitics you acknowledge prove would have virtually no effect be "important", unless you are simply trying to destroy private gun ownership?And th Longchamp handbags outlet is is why groups like the NRA will fight even sensible background checks - because the anti-gun zealots will inevitibly use them as a means of creating Longchamp sale a covert gun registry (as is done now), the only purpose of which is knowing who owns what guns so that these later "important" bans can effectively use the information to prosecute anyone who doesn't comply with what is, however you want to label it, a form of confiscation. If the anti-gun zealots would permanently disavow bans on any type of legally owned firearm, and put protections in place to prevent checks from being used this way, they would pass unanimously. But they won't do this, because as you yourself made obvious, they have another agenda.
|