過去ログ

                                Page  209303
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
   通常モードに戻る  ┃  INDEX  ┃  ≪前へ  │  次へ≫   
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
 ▼The review about pl  Cloulasyday 10/12/1(水) 2:21

 ───────────────────────────────────────
 ■題名 : The review about pl
 ■名前 : Cloulasyday <aswers122@gmail.com>
 ■日付 : 10/12/1(水) 2:21
 ■Web : http://freebiegambler.com/article/
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
   As a man, who played a lot in the real casinos, I will mention that the main plus of the given gamble-resource is that probabilities of falling out in roulette are maximally close to real ones.

I can give examples are two hits of the ball to "zero" for 10 minutes of the game.

Playing roulette in Grand Casino, the online-casino I every time win $15-30 in half an hour of a careful game. I think that such a situation is a sign of an honest game of the network casino.

To be fair, it is needed to say about failures in the work of the resource from the point of view of an ordinary user.

Firstly, it is automatic delivery of bonuses, without warning the player.

Personally I consider it as bad manners and imposing unprofitable terms of winning back the bonus.

Secondly, it is automatic writing off of the won facilities if the player refuses the receipt of bonuses in his profile. When the won facilities were not shown out in time personally I guessed that I ォgotサ to win back bonuses.
When refusing an option to charge bonuses in the profile I simply wanted not to get bonuses afterwards.

However instantly they wrote off all the money which I won after the hidden and unasked charge of a bonus.

In general, all above mentioned is a imperfection in the work of the site, which can embarrass players, counting on a permanent game on small stakes.

Further, Grand Casino does not have clear statistics of input-output of money from the player痴 deposit.

For a long time I could not understand how much I won and output for a playing day. The incomprehensible history of input-output of money simply makes me angry.

It would be better to do three columns - date/time, input (the sum) and output (the sum).
The same disorder and mess in the column ォHistory of gamesサ the time of stakes is incorrect, the history - incomplete.

In general, any contrivances are created to put a player in an unprofitable position which he cannot change in the hand mode, are not the things lift rating.
Statistics plays on the side of the establishment as well, why to make the clients position worse with tricks such as imposing bonuses and writing off money from the account?
Such a strategy is acceptable to unpresentable offices which count on a large quick income from an unscrupulous game and does not imply a long-term presence in the market.
Readm more story in my Online Casino Blog
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━    通常モードに戻る  ┃  INDEX  ┃  ≪前へ  │  次へ≫    ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━                                 Page 209303